On 06/01, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Den 2012-06-01 03:54, [email protected] skrev: > > >>http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/tot.svg > > from 2007 ?
Yes, that data goes back to 2007. And the last tick on the right is July 2012, which the data lines haven't reached yet. > how does others make spamcorpus with mta rejecting spam from rbl & > clamav milter ? I actually stopped blocking on RBLs at my MTA to get better data for this. "Real" spam sent to real users and manually verified is better than what can easily be harvested in very large quantities with spamtraps. I'd say the spam that gets through blocking on RBLs to real users is also much better than what you can get from a spam trap. What matters the most is the stuff that's hard to catch. And I fear that is currently massively under-represented. It doesn't need to be all spam that was sent to you in order to be useful for re-scoring. I think when I started I was automatically rejecting on RBLs and automatically rejecting everything over some spamassassin threshold, and the people on this list at the time had no objection to me contributing the spam that still got through. That's the most important stuff. Spam traps are obviously very useful, but I'd say they're far from representative of the spam end users ever see getting through their spam filters. -- "Let's just say that if complete and utter chaos was lightning, then he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'." - The Color of Magic http://www.ChaosReigns.com
