On Tue, July 3, 2012 00:59, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On Mon, July 2, 2012 22:57, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> On 2.7.2012 22:01, John Hardin wrote: >>> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>> >>>> On 2.7.2012 19:23, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> On 07/02, Jari Fredriksson wrote: >>>>>> I follow the wiki page. I have now implemented the following >>>>> >>>>> It seems you are interpreting the wiki as a flawless authority, when >>>>> it >>>>> would probably be more appropriate to consider it a crufty guideline >>>>> that >>>>> one of us should get around to updating. >>>>> >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CorpusCleaning >>>>> >>>>> Which part of that page made you feel you should strip out facebook? >>>>> >>>> >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HandClassifiedCorpora?highlight=%28facebook%29 >>>> >>> >>> That says to not include any _spams_ received via those channels, not >>> to >>> discard them _in toto_. >> >> Thanks! A good catch I guess, thanks for pointing out this failure in my >> reading comprehension. But those spammy messages which opened this very >> thread will be still removed, as they were in HAM corpus and rightly so. >> > > It's actually quite hard to remove those from SPAM, as they may and will > have a forged linkedin.com or facebook.com Received-header. > > I have to manually check the damn spam really carefully. > >
spamassassin seems to trigger DKIM_VALID_AU all right for Linkedin, but says dkim is invalid for Facebook.
