On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Axb wrote:
from last update's 72_scores.cf
score HDRS_LCASE 3.749 3.999 3.749 3.999
score MANY_HDRS_LCASE 1.251 1.004 1.251 1.004
Although John manually set low scores in the sandbox file, these are ignored
(per design).
They are _limits_. The generator should not exceed those scores. The newly
limited scores may take a bit to show up in an update.
Fixed/forced scores should be set via 73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf and not in
sanbox files
They have comment:
# observed in UCE 9/2009
As they are hitting lots of ham, can we please loose these.
HDRS_LCASE_IMGONLY may be another candidate to be dropped.
Alex, I don't recall if you're running masschecks; if you are, can you
include such FPs in your ham corpus? The reason they're being scored so
highly by the rescorer is they do perform well against the
masscheck corpus.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ignorance is no excuse for a law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: the 236th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
