https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6814
--- Comment #6 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #5) > Adam, thanks, do you agree that this bug (for 2/8) and the one for 5/8 must > be due to people using old rules, and therefore not actually valid? That's pretty much guaranteed. My fix merely returns the match on 250/8+ and introduces matches for non-IPv4 "IPs" (which I expect to never fire anyway). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
