On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, John Hardin wrote:

On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:

 On 8/6/2012 11:52 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>   All:
> > The masscheck corpora are persistently hovering just below the > thresholds > needed for an automatic rules update to be generated, and the > complaints
>   about the high scores for the 12LTRDOM and HDRS_LCASE rules are getting
>   louder.
> > I recommend the best immediate course of action would be to manually
>   update the 70_scores.cf file in the current updates tarball to set the
>   scores for these rules to advisory levels and release that as a new
>   update. I think this would be safer than pushing a manual rules update
>   using scores based on somewhat-starved corpora.
> > I'd be willing to do this but I don't know the details of where the > master
>   update tarballs live or how to publish a new update to DNS.
> > Is there agreement that this is an appropriate course of action? Is
>   someone who does know the details willing to do this?

 I don't think this is the right action, really.  I think we have to get
 the infrastructure for mass checks working. I know that's my focus (and
 I'm making good strides at work towards being able to focus more).

I agree that's the best and correct long-term solution. I was more concerned with fixing this specific issue immediately without introducing a lot of possible problems from simply pushing a manual rules update using the current rules and masscheck scores.

Question: would making a tarball that contains _just_ a 70_scores.cf (or more likely 72_scores.cf or even 73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf) file patch just this problem without affecting anything else? I haven't looked through the sa-update code to see what it actually does with the update files from the tarball...

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [email protected]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [email protected]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  If "healthcare is a Right" means that the government is obligated
  to provide the people with hospitals, physicians, treatments and
  medications at low or no cost, then the right to free speech means
  the government is obligated to provide the people with printing
  presses and public address systems, the right to freedom of
  religion means the government is obligated to build churches for the
  people, and the right to keep and bear arms means the government is
  obligated to provide the people with guns, all at low or no cost.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Today: the 67th anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing

Reply via email to