08.08.2012 23:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
> On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote:
>> -1 but - it spit out even more high scores.
>>
>> > Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham?
>>
>> +1 This would probably cause less havoc.
> Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change
>>
>> > Jari, are you seeing your corpus?
>> >
>> > Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
>> > Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
> OK, so here's the issue:
>
> The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass
> check log contains:
>
> # SVN revision: 1369288
>
> It uses this command:
>
> REVISION=`head corpus/usable-corpus-set${SCORESET}/* | grep "SVN
> revision" | cut -d" " -f4 | sort -rn | head -1`
>
> Short circuiting the script and looking at the corpus set manually, we
> have:
>
> head corpus/usable-corpus-set1/* | grep "SVN revision" | cut -d" "
> -f4 | sort -nr | uniq
> 1369288
> 1366614
> 1364050
> 1348336
> 1342864
> 1307740
> 1301890
> 1296586
> 1243018
> 1240465
> 1197902
> 1183598
> 1128571
> 1098073
> 1064983
> 1059274
> 1042117
> 831520
> 814117
> unknown
>
> Jari, checking your logs, we have:
>
> ham-net-jarif.log:# SVN revision: 1364050
> spam-net-jarif.log:# SVN revision: 1364050
>
> So your logs are being ignored because they are not being run with the
> "right" version of code.
>
> I'm working to find out why you have the wrong version of the code...
>
> Regards,
> KAMMy corpus came online today. Strange, if you have not done something. Or does it use my installed SA ? I had problems with that, but re-built SA from cpan... Maybe that's the key... I was in the impression that it downloads/rsyncs from development version of SA and does it's job with it, but maybe I was wrong. -- You will visit the Dung Pits of Glive soon.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
