https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6220
--- Comment #28 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> --- With masschecks flowing smoothly once again, now is especially the time to examine the performance of included vs. non-included DNSBL's. But yes, I do agree it should be removed soon. http://www.spamtips.org/2011/05/dnsbl-safety-report-5142011.html I'd like to do a similar analysis to this given the current masscheck results, which would require 2-3 weeks with the newly expanded corpus. However I am stretched too thin to work on this myself. I am just suggesting that if this project intends to actually *do* anything useful with the DNSBL masscheck results, someone else should examine safety levels in a similar manner to these old reports. I am also curious, was Mailspike ever included in the default SA rules, perhaps for 3.4.x? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
