https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6828
--- Comment #6 from RW <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #5) > tested and using -4 and autolearn only (no manual trainig) on a very mixed > user base and site wide Bayes has been very reliable.. The trouble with making ham autolearning dependent on DNS whitelists is that the training can change dramatically with the scores of those rules. If you started training a while ago when RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED scored -4, then you will have trained on a much wider selection that you if start over now. Currently you'll be reliant on RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI and combinations like RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED+RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED, which will mean mostly autogenerated mail from companies like Amazon, and direct marketing mail, but probably almost no person to person mail. Also if someone turns-off DNS whitelists they wont learn any ham at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
