https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Comment #4 from Darxus <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1: sorbs ignore that my isp put me in ripe.net in a dynamic pool, but still > list me as static self ranged in ripe.net (80.162.68.52/30 and > 2.104.223.8/30) is seperated listed, so i have verified its static as long > the ripe listning is there > 2: i have unsuccesfull tryed to get sorbs to make human talk back to me on > the problem, but none so far have being try to help me there This is a problem between you and sorbs, not related to SA. > 1: is this maybe an hidded bug in how spamassassin is using sorbs ? Without any evidence that it is, I'd confidently assume it's not. Check it for yourself, using the "host" command, note IPs are reversed in blacklist DNS records: # This indicates 190.25.224.27 is listed by sorbs: $ host 27.224.25.190.dnsbl.sorbs.net 27.224.25.190.dnsbl.sorbs.net has address 127.0.0.7 # This indicates 64.71.152.40 is not listed by sorbs: $ host 40.152.71.64.dnsbl.sorbs.net Host 40.152.71.64.dnsbl.sorbs.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) If you get the same results with this host command on your (DUL listed) server, but it's not working with spamassassin, then maybe it's a spamassassin bug. > 2: is sorbs createing list in a way that works or not works ? Blocking queries from DUL IPs isn't enough of a reason to remove sorbs from the default SA rules, and there is nothing else the SA project can do. > why is sorbs dns server give me refussed in bind9 logs Because they feel it's a better use of their resources? I don't know, not related to SA. You're sure you're not using forwarders in your bind server? This is an issue for you to discuss with the users list, not in a bug report. > if its unfair from me to ask about it, then i would just take sorbs out of > the problem, if spammassassin dont care i will drop spamassassin an use > dspam in future By all means, do whatever works best for you. Is dspam just a bayesian filter? So it would be like... continuing to use spamassassin with all the network tests and all the other non-bayes rules disabled? > but i hate the above problems I'm sorry you find it so unpleasant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
