On 10/22/2012 12:24 AM, John Hardin wrote:
All:Would it make sense to implement a lower limit on the body size of a message for autolearning, to avoid autolearning as ham any FN spams that (e.g.) just have a URI in the body and nothing else?
imo, no.
Would it make sense to implement such a limit just for autolearning as ham?
dittoif anything it should be a done using switchable eval/range plugin & rules with tflags noautolearn but should not be done within the core.
