On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
On 12/10/2012 11:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
> Why isn't Zmailer dev requested to fix it?
> Lowering our defenses for software which hardly anybody uses anymore
> and which hasn't seen a release since 2007?
If the performance apart from zmailer is good in masscheck, then perhaps
an offsetting score for zmailer MUA only?
Zmailer is a fossil of a MTA, not a MUA.
Ah. Ok. But the question is still valid, assuming there's some way to
identify Zmailer in the Received headers...
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Activist: Someone who gets involved.
Unregistered Lobbyist: Someone who gets involved with something
the MSM doesn't approve of. -- WizardPC
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until Bill of Rights day
