On 01/04, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I'm guessing timezones or something, perhaps?
> HAM: 207117 (150000 required) > SPAM: 195783 (150000 required) Are you suggesting there's something like 50,000 spams that are right at the age boundary so that a different calculation of age based on different time zones could result in rule generation getting such a different count of sufficiently recent spams than ruleqa? > Do you want me to add you to the updatesd cron output email list so > you can see the file? Yes. > >>>20130102: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: > >>>http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20130102 > >>>20130102: Spam: 146127, Ham: 176536 -- "I don't want people who want to dance, I want people who have to dance." --George Balanchine http://www.ChaosReigns.com
