https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6895
--- Comment #5 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Does this prevent DKIM_VALID from hitting? > > Yes, of course: such signature does not have a domain > to associate a public key with, so can't possibly be valid(-ated). Thought so, just checking. Question: would (DKIM_SIGNED && !DKIM_VALID) be a reasonable test to detect such, or would that hit on properly-formed-but-invalid DKIM signatures as well, which would make it a less-useful test? It would be best to detect malformed vs. properly-formed in the plugin and expose an eval for that, is that easy to do? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
