https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6903
--- Comment #10 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #9) > Really sorry to keep doing this, but.. > > While going through the revision history for this file, I noticed this: > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=991855> > > IOW, Runbox has been removed from the list once before, for no longer > offering free accounts. > > The question at hand is: Should the list include domains from providers who > do not offer permanently free accounts, but from which accounts are free > during a limited time trial period? > > I'm inclined to opine that it should, since 30 days is plenty of time to > abuse an account. OTOH, providers may have stricter monitoring of outgoing > messages from trial accounts (as is the case with at least FastMail). > > I ask not just for Runbox, but also for FastMail, who moved to the same > model last year, and offer a great number of domains to choose from, many of > which are already in the list (I can procure a complete updated list - it > rarely changes anymore). IMO, If it shows up in mailflow, frequently, it could/would be added again. Same could apply to others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
