On 03/06/2013 01:17 AM, [email protected] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6114
--- Comment #27 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply to comment #24)
I'd like to increase spam corpus size
If I do, processing time of the weekly checkss so long that it doesn not
fit in the timeslot.
Removing "no hit" rules "nopublish" bloat, etc would probably shorten
masscheck time.
Would there be any harm in excluding all non-network nopublish rules from
weekly?
khop-sc-neighbors rules aren't actually network rules, and are intentionally
scored far higher when network checks are disabled -- or when DNSEval isn't
loaded.
However, I think you were asking in general, in which case that discussion
should be moved to the dev email list.
Moved off Bugzilla
could we loose the autogenerated KHOP_ISC_* (20_isc_attackers.cf) rules?
They have zero hits.
My request is general.
As I see it, to run nopublish rules for a while may make sense while
developing, check perfomance, etc but to keep them in that state for
years shows lack of respect of other ppl's volunteered masscheck
resources, no matter how optimized and lightweight rules/test may be.
And/or the sandbox owner has lost interest in the project and we should
treat these rules as unmaintained and purge.
atm, sa-update is publishing updates regularly tho we could use more
ham. (according to http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/tot.svg, we're
dangerously low)
comments? ideas? rants?
Axb
