Dear AdminGroup, back in 2010 I have edited the DnsBlocklist site http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists and added a link to our Blacklist Monitor. Now I've tried to move our link from "Accuracy" into "Other Lists", but for some reason I'm not able to edit the site anymore.
I've attached a patch with my changes. It would be great if someone could take over the changes or add me (username: bjoern) to the editor group. Many thanks in advance! Regards, Bjoern -- Björn Sikora
--- DnsBlocklists.txt.orig 2013-03-21 14:51:59.893509569 +0100 +++ DnsBlocklists.txt 2013-03-21 14:37:40.758509500 +0100 @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ * '''ISIPP Accreditation Database''' (IADB) http://www.isipp.com/email-accreditation/ == Accuracy == -Live accuracy figures for most of the DNSBLs used in SpamAssassin, based on the Oct 2003 mail feed for one user, can be found [[http://taint.org/2003/11/07/184247a_mail.html|here]].<<BR>> -Weekly statistics of accuracy and failure rates for specific blacklists can be found [[http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/|here]]. +Live accuracy figures for most of the DNSBLs used in SpamAssassin, based on the Oct 2003 mail feed for one user, can be found [[http://taint.org/2003/11/07/184247a_mail.html|here]]. == Other Lists == @@ -52,6 +51,7 @@ * List of All Known DNS-based Spam Databases (blacklists) http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm * Current Blacklist Comparison (note: no statistics for false positive rates) http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html * Wikipedia on DNSBLs http://wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSBL + * Weekly Blacklist Statistics (including hit rate and false positive rate) http://www.intra2net.com/en/support/antispam/ Note that it's extremely important to compare false positive rates (nonspam messages marked as spam), as well as spam hit-rates, when evaluating any anti-spam system, include DNS blocklists. (For example, a blocklist that returned a match for every single mail would 'catch all the spam', but would also mark every nonspam mail too.) Some of the above pages omit this information, so take with a pinch of salt.
