https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6926
--- Comment #2 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Which currently reveals we're missing: > > bl bq bv cw eh gb mf post sj ss sx um Ah, now I see the comment in RegistrarBoundaries.pm: # The following have been removed from the list because they are # inactive, as can be seen in the Wikipedia articles about them # as of 2008-02-08, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.so_%28domain_name%29 # bv gb pm sj so um yt A quick summary of all the candidates: bl - Saint Barthélemy (French), reserved but unassigned bq - Carribean Netherlands, designated but not yet used bv - Bouvet Island (Norway), reserved and sponsored but unused cw - Curaçao, new and in use, http://www.una.cw/cw_registry/ eh - Western Sahara, no recognized government, reserved but not in use gb - Great Britain, abandoned except ~3 hosts under .dra.hmg.gb mf - Saint Martin (French), reserved but unassigned post - Universal Postal Union (snail mail), new as of August sj - Svalbard and Jan Mayen (Norway), reserved and sponsored but unused ss - South Sudan, new and registered, still pending (nation formed 2011-07) sx - Sint Maarten (Netherlands), new, in use (open), http://registry.sx/ um - US Minor Outlying Islands (USA), revoked (why is it listed?) It looks like it's still valid to avoid bv gb sj and um. We should add cw and post and sx. The others may be on their way, but don't need inclusion quite yet. Given how .sx has open registration and looks like "sex," I expect it to attract porn sites, which means spam. We definitely want to include that one. You can find these on wikipedia like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.so (note the dot, also note that the disambiguation page from 2008 is gone) and similarly at IANA like https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/so.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
