https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #5 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kip from comment #4) > Use your common sense. Just looking at the console output you can see that > the error is being raised in spamc process. Even if the OP associated it > with Evolution, you could have simply commented on what you knew they had > intended. The "OP [who] associated it with Evolution" is you. You filed both, the Ubuntu bug (against Evolution) and this bug (against SA upstream). Please do not refer to you in third person. The error logged by syslog states failing to create a UNIX socket. By default, both spamc and spamd are using TCP port 783, not a UNIX socket. The ps output in comment 0 shows the system-wide running spamd (pid 18498) to listen on the default TCP 783, whereas the per-user spamd daemon (pid 2789) is indeed using custom options to use a UNIX socket. What are the owner, group and mode of that socket? What group(s) is the user 'kip' a member of? The per-user spamd daemon has been launched by Evolution / its spam filter plugin with these custom options. Evolution also is what is starting a spamc process for each message to be scanned. Having both using the same unique, randomized socketpath and proper permissions is the responsibility of Evolution. > [...] If you > don't have an answer why this is happening, that is ok, but just wait for > someone who does. You are seriously having an attitude problem. Oh, and your recent comment of "This is still driving me nuts. Any help appreciated." to the Ubuntu bug report clearly shows you do not understand what a bug-tracker is. But you dismissed this when I pointed it out in comment 1, so I do not expect you to listen this time either. This is not a SA bug. I am tired of you, though, and will wait for someone else to close this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
