https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
Kip <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #47 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #46) > Nope, it is not. *sigh* It seems some of the "test-cases" added here by all > of us are partially using spamc global configuration that affects the test. Sounds like another bug. > From the spamc man-page about EXIT CODES: > > "By default, spamc will use the 'safe fallback' error recovery method. > That means, it will always exit with an exit code if 0, even if an > error was encountered. If any error occurrs, it will simply pass > through the unaltered message." Since you hadn't realized that until after the fact that three other people replicated the same issue, it drives my point home again that the error control is not adequate. > Please refrain from adding further comments here, unless you have something > substantial and new to add to this report. I've asked you the same, and while I've supplied a patch, and you've already encouraged us that you would stop trolling (comment #5), you're still here. > Feel free to move any further discussion to the dev list. Bugzilla is not an > appropriate place for this type of discussions and arguing. Neither the issue tracker, nor the mailing list, is an appropriate place to troll people who are helping you fix and improve your software. > VR, with all due respect: Your bugzilla account has been created on > 2013-05-29 22:36:50 UTC, just minutes before your first comment 40 at > 22:50:57 UTC. You have never been subscribed with this account's address to > the SA dev@ list, either, so you didn't get the on-list bug mail. > > Please, enlighten us who you are, or how you noticed this report. It's the distro's fault. It's Evolution's fault. It's the patch writer's fault. Now the the other end users who replicated the same issue are suspect. But SA is infallible. It doesn't matter who he is and he doesn't need to be trolled either. There is no requirement that you monitor this ticket. Just leave us be. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
