https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7022
--- Comment #13 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to AXB from comment #12) > (In reply to John Hardin from comment #11) > > (In reply to AXB from comment #10) > > > > > > Am I getting this right? > > > 1.- normalization would have to be switched on ? > > > > Agree. > > > > > 2.- normalized rules would require a tflag ? > > > > That's backwards. Running against the normalized text would be the default, > > you'd need a tflag to run against the non-normalized (raw) text. (I > > hesitate to use "raw" in this discussion, to avoid confusion with > > "rawbody".) > > hmm.. that means that 90% of our rules would have the opt-out tflag when 90% > of the spamflow is detected without normalizing anything? > I must be missing something I agree with AXB. If you want to use the normalized text, the tflag would be required so new rules can use the concept and not modify all the pre-existing rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
