https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5549
--- Comment #5 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to flokli from comment #4) > I'm not sure if the headers in postfix ever included the "(Postfix)" part.... > > According to the postfix mailing list > (http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-03/1958.html), > the feature already got into postfix in the form of my patch. > > Would a patch be okay that accepts both forms? > > We could probably also extend the rules to support some other common > "Authenticated sender:" patterns, as some tend to modify these... That is my point. The SA patch has to keep existing functionality AND add flexibility for the format change. It should include documentation such as what version of postfix specifically works and preferably some real world headers to use as test cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
