Kelsey Cummings wrote, On 3/07/14 11:21 am: > This is quick patch to fix this so service_timeout() is guarded with an > alarm but I don't think it is the only write to a client that needs it.
For any write to client other than the one that tries to tell the client that there was a timeout, wouldn't service_timeout() end up being called when the spamd times out while blocked waiting for that other write to client? What would be the situation with any other write to client that would need a similar patch?
