On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 7/30/2014 11:45 AM, Axb wrote:--- 20_misc_testing.cf (revision 1614687) +++ 20_misc_testing.cf (revision 1614688) @@ -1572,5 +1572,6 @@ uri URI_IP_UNSUB m;^[a-z]+://(?:\d+\.){3}\d+/.*unsubscribe;i describe URI_IP_UNSUB IP-address unsubscribe URI +tflags URI_IP_UNSUB publish http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20140729-r1614286-n/T_URI_IP_UNSUB/detail Why is this rule being tflagged to publish? it's S/0 hardly rates it. with only 19 masscheck hits?According to the wiki, "rules without an explicit "tflags publish" line are never published", https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateBackend
...which isn't actually how it behaves, as there are quite a few rules in my sandbox that don't have "tflags publish" yet are going out.
So this means more that it's now for consideration of promotion. I do not believe it's auto-promotion which is what I think you are thinking.
It is a nudge, it appears to make it *more likely* to be promoted, but isn't actually an on/off switch.
Right now, since it's T_, it's being handled as a test rule not a promoted rule.
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Where We Want You To Go Today 09/13/07: Microsoft patents in-OS adware architecture that incorporates monitoring and analysis of user actions and interrupting the user to display apparently relevant advertisements (U.S. Patent #20070214042) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 days until the 279th anniversary of John Peter Zenger's acquittal
