https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7115
--- Comment #15 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #13) > (In reply to Mark Martinec from comment #12) > > Couldn't resist factoring out common code from > > +1.00000000000 > > KAM (In reply to AXB from comment #14) > now we're getting all these new bayes bells & whistles, would't it be a good > moment to get rid of the BAYES_999 and do the correct BAYES_100 ? Not a real high priority for me. bug 7013 had some discussion on this but I seem to remember there were barriers in code that we found when trending down this path before. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
