https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7155
Bug ID: 7155
Summary: Oddness with -R and --full
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows 7
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: spamc/spamd
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same
> in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expected
> --full behaves identical zu --full-spam
>
> -r, --full-spam Print full report for messages identified as spam.
> -R, --full Print full report for all messages.
> ____________________________
>
> BROKEN: /usr/bin/spamc --full --port=10029 < sample.eml
> OK: /usr/bin/spamc R --port=10029 < sample.eml
>
The spamc code seems to concur -R and --full are the same option:
{ "full", no_argument, 0, 'R' }
Looking in the code, nothing jumps out as a logic issue but testing on my
command line with ham shows problems
spamc -R -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
<starts with the score/threshold and then the report>
spamc --full -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
<prints nothing. I would expect it to do the same as -R>
Testing on my command line spam:
spamc -r -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/2
spamc --full -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/2
<Identical output of just the report>
The code for R sets flags |= SPAMC_REPORT;
Also, just duplicate the docs as referring to -r for the output format was
easily missed:
-r, --full-spam
Just output the SpamAssassin report text to stdout, if the message
is spam. If the message is ham (non-spam), nothing will be printed. The first
line of the output is the message score and the
threshold, in this format:
score/threshold
-R, --full
Just output the SpamAssassin report text to stdout, for all
messages. See -r for details of the output format used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
