https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7156
--- Comment #16 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mark Martinec from comment #14) > These three samples do not produce a 'dns: new_dns_packet' warning here, > although I do have a few other samples that do. In these the dots are > indeed there (if I remember correctly, some were a result of incorrect > QP encoding, need to check again). Seemed to me that these errors in > URL were a result of some mail composition sw bug, not an intentional > obfuscation. > > I don't have much of an opinion on what to do about these, apart that > whatever is decided should be a part of URI parsing/cleaning code, > rather than a hack in DNS querying code (which noone is suggesting, > just wanted be mention such possibility). I didn't suggest it hoping you'd find something... .-) > Probably depends on whether some browser can make use of such URL. In the samples I've seen, the URLs are perfectly ok the samples Per submitted are perfectly clickable <<GRMBL>> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
