https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7139
--- Comment #22 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to John Hardin from comment #21) > (In reply to AXB from comment #20) > > (In reply to John Hardin from comment #19) > > > (In reply to AXB from comment #18) > > > > (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #17) > > > > > (In reply to AXB from comment #16) > > > > > > score FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 2.000 > > > > > > > > > > > > as I saw S/O in > > > > > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20150330-r1670013-n/FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2/detail > > > > > > > > > > > > The axb-8mile corpus is all japanese/chinese spam > > > > > > > > > > I'm confused. Above you said it was bad. This comment implies it is > > > > > hitting on all spam with 100% hit rate. > > > > > > > > its bad S/O in my production but according to my masscheck corpus, > > > > apparently hitting hard on a specific type of spam. > > > > > > Overall masscheck reports an S/O of .996, hitting 33% of spam. That's not > > > too bad. > > > > > > Analysis of current overlaps suggests an additional FP exclusion of > > > !__RP_MATCHES_RCVD would be beneficial (49% of ham, no spam) - would that > > > help your production S/O? > > > > Was this comment for Jake? > > No, it was for you (AXB). Don't worry about my results. We should try to solve Jake's problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
