https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7162
--- Comment #1 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #0) > On 9/10/2014 9:47 AM, Axb wrote: > > for quite a while I've been playing with autolearn settings > > > > SA's default is: > > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1 > > > > this *can* cause low scored spam to be learnt as ham. > > > > For several months I've been using > > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -1.0 > > > > and so far no more false negatives have been learnt as ham which is was > > hoping for. > > If you're using autolearn, you may want to play with that threshold.. > > KAM: Based on your expertise with Bayes, should we change the default for > 3.4.1? I'm +1 for it. While I still support the idea, I think this shouldn't be changed in a 3.4.x release. Rather wait for 3.5 where ppl will be more inclined to accept more radical changes. so I'm -1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
