https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7215
--- Comment #10 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> --- > My expectation with using more UTF8 (or 16) as the internal guts for SA is > that perl 5.14 becomes a baseline install where that works well from my > memory at least. > I want to set a good expectation that newer perl is needed for SA 4.X unless > you think I'm just being elitist. I agree that 5.14 or maybe 5.12 is the baseline for more serious Unicode support. Although we may do it in steps: bump up the minimal version one notch with each specific problem we encounter during development. With basic Unicode support (and even the user-defined character classes) it seems the 5.8.9 is still able to cope somehow. > unless you think I'm just being elitist. Elitist? We are running 5.22 and 5.20 on our servers here :)) Have to dig deep to find something running 5.16, let alone 5.14 around here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
