https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7286
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to RW from comment #2) > I think the original point of gated_through_received_hdr_remover() was to > avoid FPs in rules that might be broken by header removal. I don't see the > logic to the meta-rule. Masscheck results for that combination hit a lot of low-scoring spam and little or no ham. > I'm wondering if someone contributing spam to rule QA has been stripping > their > own received headers, It's certainly possible that modifications of masscheck messages render that rule less accurate in masscheck - I know that happens with one subrule because of the way axb captures his corpora, I got bitten by it because it seemed to be a great spam sign and had to stop relying on how it behaves in masscheck. I could certainly add an exclusion so that only one of the two rules hits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
