https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7377
--- Comment #4 from RW <[email protected]> --- (In reply to YA from comment #3) > I see what you're referring to. I should've setup a separate scoring when > network is disabled, right? No, the default score should be 0.01, which is the score for a testing rule. Unless something strange happened the 0.5 score is locally defined. > But why would this rule be triggered at all when > no network exists? DKIM can't verify the sig when DNS is down. Probably because that would require new perl, and at the moment it's just a simple meta-rule. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
