https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7653
Bill Cole <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P5 Target Milestone|Undefined |Future Severity|major |enhancement Hardware|PC |All CC| |[email protected] OS|Windows NT |All --- Comment #7 from Bill Cole <[email protected]> --- THIS IS NOT A BUG. It is a request for a new feature. I have adjusted metadata fields appropriately. URIDNSBL rules apply only to body URIs and *optionally* to domains parsed from DKIM headers if parse_dkim_uris is set. This is well-documented intentional behavior. As Henrik has noted, the existing URIDNSBL design is not intuitive and as the opening of this as a "major" bug demonstrates, it leads to confusion. To simply add on the mis-guessed rule syntax in this report to the core broken design would be short-sighted and would cement the confusing design in place. I think we need a broader discussion of what this enhancement should be precisely, involving users and list operators, rather than just an enhancement request in Bugzilla. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
