On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Henrik K wrote:
PS. John, all these rules from your sandbox seem to have very broken
scores, could you perhaps add informative scores to
73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf for these? Atleast that method should work
100% for now..
FROM_IN_TO_AND_SUBJ 2.199
OBFU_TEXT_ATTACH 1.699
MIME_NO_TEXT 1.542
AD_PREFS 1.399
URI_WP_HACKED_2 1.304
STYLE_GIBBERISH 1.111
UC_GIBBERISH_OBFU 1.000
LUCRATIVE 1.000
HEXHASH_WORD 1.000
FROM_WORDY 1.000
AC_HTML_NONSENSE_TAGS 1.000
LONG_HEX_URI 0.896
FROM_PAYPAL_SPOOF 0.727
Not all of those are in my sandbox. For example, AC_HTML_NONSENSE_TAGS is
in KAM's.
I spent some time today (which I did not have yesterday) to review and
update the tuning on many of those rules to improve their S/O.
I also tried adding scores to 73_sandbox_manual_scores.cf for them to
suppress the net scores until those changes can be evaluated by the weekly
masscheck, but ran into a problem - see SA bug 7721.
The tuning should minimize the problem from the stale net scores, so I'm
reluctant to alter their global scores, except for AD_PREFS, which is a
very simple rule that seems to be falling afoul of a lot of "legitimate"
marketing emails (i.e. actually subscribed to) in the masscheck ham
corpora and thus can't really be tuned.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you a mildly tech-literate politico horrified by the level of
ignorance demonstrated by lawmakers gearing up to regulate online
technology they don't even begin to grasp? Cool. Now you have a
tiny glimpse into a day in the life of a gun owner. -- Sean Davis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until SWMBO's Birthday
