https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7742
Bill Cole <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Bill Cole <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Brian J. Murrell from comment #2) > I can appreciate that it would be more ideal to push this up into the MTA, > but I doubt how many MTAs could actually handle it or even gathering > interest in having them handle it. Not necessarily the MTA proper, but the 'glue' layer between an MTA and SA, e.g. a milter, a script wrapping spamc that re-injects scanned mail or delivers it, etc. For example, the Milter API includes a "quarantine" action reply from the milter to the MTA and both Sendmail and Postfix will hold messages in a special queue if a milter responds with that reply. Amavis and MIMEDefang both support quarantine mechanisms based on SA scoring. In other words: glue layers and MTAs already have quarantine implementations which can be used to sideline messages based on SA scoring. Logic and tooling for rescan and/or release from those existing facilities makes more sense than building a whole new quarantine facility in SA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
