+1 for this. Noting the problem at 'info' is good.
On 20 Nov 2019, at 13:41, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:29:10PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
anybody against this diff ?
Giovanni
Index: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm
===================================================================
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm (revision 1870052)
+++ lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm (working copy)
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@
if ($rcode eq 'REFUSED' || $id =~
m{^\d+/NO_QUESTION_IN_PACKET\z}) {
# the failure was already reported above
} else {
- info("dns: no callback for id %s, ignored; packet: %s",
+ dbg("dns: no callback for id %s, ignored; packet: %s",
$id, $packet ? $packet->string : "undef" );
}
# report a likely matching query for diagnostic purposes
If you would check trunk it's already there. Please use the same code
for
uniformity.
info("dns: no callback for id $id, ignored, packet on next
debug line");
# prevent filling normal logs with huge packet dumps
dbg("dns: %s", $packet ? $packet->string : "undef");
--
Bill Cole
[email protected] or [email protected]
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire