https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7831
--- Comment #3 from RW <[email protected]> --- I should elaborate a bit. As I understand it section 3.10 is about the validity of signature headers like the one in A. It's not about alignment with RFC5322.From. However, if a combination like this: DKIM-Signature: ... [email protected] ... d=example.com From: [email protected] hits DKIM_VALID but not DKIM_VALID_AU then that's clearly a bug. The case of B is either handled by DMARC or, in the case of DKIM_VALID_AU, it's a design decision - DKIM_VALID_AU is equivalent to DMARC's strict DKIM alignment. IMO SA could benefit from a relaxed version of DKIM_VALID_AU, as well as a relaxed author aligned version of SPF_PASS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
