On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Loren Wilton wrote:
See attached spample.
Is there a boundary missing in that spample? It seems to go from a couple
lines of QP text into base64 with no intervening boundary.
It's properly formed. Compare the plaintext part to the HTML part, note
that the base64 block is QP'd base64, and note that there's some more QP
spam pitch text after the base64 block.
I think the base64 "hidden" text was pasted into the plaintext part by the
spammer. Whether intentionally (to impede scanning) or by accident isn't
clear, but I think it was probably by accident.
Perhaps the spammer's message composing tool isn't hiding invisible text
when it generates the plaintext body part from the HTML part?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The premise of gun control in America is that rural conservatives
must be disarmed because urban leftists are violent and predatory.
-- Grumpy Old Fart @ TSM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until the 233rd anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution
