https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7857
--- Comment #10 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- I just noticed an apparent error in the antipatterns in the test script that I cloned: 185 invalid_ltd.foo !invalid_tld 186 invalid_ltd.bar !invalid_tld 187 invalid_ltd.xyzzy !invalid_tld 188 invalid_ltd.co.zz !invalid_tld 189 190 www.invalid_ltd.foo !invalid_tld 191 www.invalid_ltd.bar !invalid_tld 192 www.invalid_ltd.xyzzy !invalid_tld 193 www.invalid_ltd.co.zz !invalid_tld Shouldn't the "_ltd" / "_tld" bit match to ensure the invalid TLD is not captured as a URI? Or are these essentially NOP'd out by mangling because SA is not doing valid-TLD filtering? If so, should these be explicitly commented out instead of being mangled so they pass? Like this antipattern: 222 #keyword:sportscar !sportscar The SVN history shows it's been that way since the initial commit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
