https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7888
--- Comment #15 from John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> --- > while the software is being used maliciously, it is commercial software > (https://www.mailwizz.com) and this rule would punish everyone who bought > the software, legitimate or otherwise. I was not aware of that, I'd assumed this was a service-based situation. Thanks for that information. > It simple suggests making the rules "non-keyed" i.e using just X- and > not X-xxx- I'm curious to know if this would work as they suggest though. That seems to me the best suggestion. Why they thought using randomly-named headers was a good idea is beyond me. Rather than taking the random bit completely out, though, I suggest changing the prefix to something usefully unique but not random, like "X-Reactivemail-" (your company name). If the software depends on those headers being unique to properly process bounces et. al., that should be sufficient. > The only exclusion is ... There are more now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
