https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7956
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #15 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #11) > Like described in Bug 6802, the culprit is "st". It expands similarly to > "ss". > > A possible workaround might also be escaping "st" to "s[t]", atleast here it > stops complaining.. > > (?<!lis[t]-manage\.) Dammit, it passed lint here or I wouldn't have committed it. PERL 5.34 (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #10) > John should just ditch that lookbehind in the rule, it can be as easily done > with a lookahead etc. I tried a lookahead first and it complicated the rule more than I wanted. There are lookbehind assertions elsewhere that don't cause problems, but they may not use ss/st text. Taking a look... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
