https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7962
--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- Some quick benchmarks with 100 emails sa-compile stock 18.47user 0.15system 0:18.62elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 129804maxresident)k 18.49user 0.11system 0:18.61elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 128388maxresident)k stock 20.95user 0.08system 0:21.04elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 126452maxresident)k 20.75user 0.21system 0:20.97elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 124616maxresident)k sa-compile massive rules 37.11user 0.32system 0:37.91elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 231652maxresident)k 37.48user 0.23system 0:37.82elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 232732maxresident)k massive rules 54.89user 0.18system 0:55.19elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 211108maxresident)k 53.17user 0.28system 0:53.57elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 210512maxresident)k Maybe 10% speedup with completely stock trunk (<400 body rules). 30% when there are heaps of extra rules (heinlein, KAM etc, 3000+ body rules). I guess I'll spend a little more of my holiday verifying that mass-check results are identical with and without sa-compile, with regards to all the UTF-8 stuff etc.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.