https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7962

--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> ---
Some quick benchmarks with 100 emails

sa-compile stock
18.47user 0.15system 0:18.62elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
129804maxresident)k
18.49user 0.11system 0:18.61elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
128388maxresident)k

stock
20.95user 0.08system 0:21.04elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
126452maxresident)k
20.75user 0.21system 0:20.97elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
124616maxresident)k

sa-compile massive rules
37.11user 0.32system 0:37.91elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
231652maxresident)k
37.48user 0.23system 0:37.82elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
232732maxresident)k

massive rules
54.89user 0.18system 0:55.19elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
211108maxresident)k
53.17user 0.28system 0:53.57elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
210512maxresident)k

Maybe 10% speedup with completely stock trunk (<400 body rules). 30% when there
are heaps of extra rules (heinlein, KAM etc, 3000+ body rules).

I guess I'll spend a little more of my holiday verifying that mass-check
results are identical with and without sa-compile, with regards to all the
UTF-8 stuff etc..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to