https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7987
--- Comment #15 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #12) > Of course we can vote if got_miss() etc would be better name for > rule_ready(). And documentation needs some more polishing. What I don't like about got_miss(), is that it doesn't necessarily mark a "miss". It's possible to call got_hit() after it, especially in multiple-lookups-for-one-rule scenario, where it would be complex for the plugin itself to track all lookups. Much simpler to call rule_ready on every callback. Though xurrent logic is not perfect either.. if the last lookup timeouts, it ends up as unrun rule. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
