https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7735
Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lwil...@earthlink.net
--- Comment #60 from Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net> ---
My mind keeps coming back to the idea of marking unrun rules that are
dependencies as zero score, and running the dependent metas.
Or simplify that to marking all unruns as zero score and as having run. I mean,
if the rule didn't run, then it didn't hit, and a rule that doesn't hit has
zero score.
I think unrun is a good internal concept for ordering dependent rule
evaluations, but I'm much less convinced that it is a good external concept. I
tend to think that it is a bit of mechanics that should be hidden.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
