Mass check runs from trunk, there are no ties to any specific version, aside from testing built rules.tar.gz with all 3.4 and 4.0 releases.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:51:29AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I don't think a branch would break things but my memory is that mass check is > built on 3.4 specifically. I think a lot of scripts and whatnot need to be > updated. > > I am not a resource that remembers this just from a decade or so ago when I > rebuilt the server. Henrik rebuilt it more recently so he might have better > pointers. I am happy to help though. > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 22:19 Sidney Markowitz <[1]sid...@sidney.com> wrote: > > Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 18/12/22 3:45 pm: > > One con is that we do need to get masscheck and various tools on the > > server to work with the new 4.0 release. I'm not sure my eyesight is > > good enough to do it anymore but I'm happy to help! > > Questions: > > If I were to go ahead and branch, would that break masscheck and/or any > other tools that are in use? If so, how do we coordinate doing the > branching with whatever has to be changed in those scripts and processes? > > Who besides you has the knowledge to make those changes? I've been > assuming that it is everyone I see doing masscheck and rule update and > ruleqa/sysdmin list stuff that I haven't involved myself with, but is > there actually more of a bottleneck going on? > > > > > References: > > [1] mailto:sid...@sidney.com
