https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8106
--- Comment #4 from Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raym...@prolocation.net> --- I do see KAM's suggestion to use the 'freemail' statement. And i can use that. It also would mean i have to do a second rule for non freemail domains. But thats a workable solution. I agree with Beny the concept of uridnsbl_skip_domain should be looked again at. And i can at least walk over the list that we supplied (years ago). Domains that were top talkers a decade ago might have shifted a little by now. I think i will resubmit the ticket later in time to redo the uridnsbl_skip_domain section (for the part that SURBL supplied). I think we can close this one in that case. As for Benny's comment that SURBL data right now ismnt used in headers checks. Thats correct and very likely to be changed in the very near feature. Hence me looking into the uridnsbl_skip_domain part :) Thanks! Raymond Dijkxhoorn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
