https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8189
ADDISON74 <addisonmatt...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |addisonmatt...@gmail.com
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #2 from ADDISON74 <addisonmatt...@gmail.com> ---
This was not a personal request. SORBS is not working in SpamAssassin based on
the default configuration as you claim. To prove you wrong, I will make the
next tests.
1. I used SpamAssassin based on the default installation with an email message
that should be identified in the SORBS lists. I did the testing in the CLI and
SA didn't find anything wrong.
2. I modified the SpamAssassin configuration file and added the following local
rules
header LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG Sender listed in SORBS Aggregated
tflags LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG net
score LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG 2.5
header LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL Sender listed in SORBS DUL
tflags LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL net
score LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.5
header LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM Sender listed in SORBS Spam
tflags LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM net
score LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM 1.5
header LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','new.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW Sender listed in SORBS New Spam
tflags LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW net
score LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW 1.5
header LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT Sender listed in SORBS Recent Spam
tflags LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT net
score LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT 1.5
I tested the message again in CLI and SA found the IP in AGG and NEW. Most
probably SA needs to update its DNSBL information regarding SORBS. The whole
SORBS section in SA needs to be revised based on this information
http://www.sorbs.net/general/using.shtml.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
