https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8211
Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |billc...@apache.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> ---
While multiple current and former PCCC associates (including myself) are
heavily involved in supporting and maintaining SpamAssassin, PCCC is an
independent commercial entity offering products that can be used with
SpamAssassin but are NOT part of the ASF SpamAssassin Project. Their specific
rules distributed as the "KAM rules channel" and their HashBLs are not
distributed or supported here. The ASF SpamAssassin Project does not operate
*any* HashBL. We provide the HashBL plugin so that users can configure their
own systems to use 3rd-party HashBLs. There are NO specific HashBLs or HashBL
rules configured in the code distribution or in the default rules channel
maintained by the ASF SpamAssassin Project.
You may also benefit from opening this discussion on the SpamAssassin Users
mailing list and by re-reading the documentation of what HashBLs are for, how
they work, and why they are fundamentally DIFFERENT from DNSBLs: 'perldoc
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HashBL' will show you the internal documentation.
If you believe there's something wrong with the PCCC HashBL or the rules in the
KAM channel that reference it, contact PCCC for specific help with their
products.
There is no bug in SA described in this report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
