https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8272
--- Comment #7 from Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #6) […] > I propose changing it to try decoding with UTF-8 again, but not strict, > i.e., without the FB_CROAK flag, so it can succeed even when there are some > non-UTF-8 bytes that will be mis-decoded. > > What do people think? Any alternative suggestions? What about trying it that way in the first instance? If we're always going to retry a bad decode, what's the point of doing the strict form in the first place? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
