I see what you are saying. My understanding was they just wanted the flag to be 
available so that other plugins could use it. I'm not sure if adjusting scores 
is a good idea or not. 
Thank you
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:33 PM, Bill Cole 
<[email protected]> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: External email from: sa-‌bugz-‌20080315@‌billmail.‌scconsult.‌com
Use caution before clicking on links or opening attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2025-01-27 at 16:29:29 UTC-0500 (Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:29:29 +0000)
Kent Oyer <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
is rumored to have said:

Here's a couple more that I've worked on but am unable to close:
6043

I don't see a resolution there. Does the cited issue no longer occur 
in 4.x?

Yes I believe that is the case. The question is from 15 years ago and 
the OP was asking how to determine if a URI came from a link or if it 
was parsed from text (i.e. "non-linkified"). The solution is to check 
the link type:
if ( $info->{'types'}->{'a'} ) { # this URI came from a clickable 
link } if ( $info->{'types'}->{'parsed'} ) { # this URI was parsed 
from text }

The specific ask of the bug has been fulfilled: get_uri_detail() returns 
the fact that a URI is "unlinked" (not in a form that a MUA is likely to 
linkify) and/or "parsed" (URL in the body text, not in a HTML tag) 
and/or "schemeless" (such as an email address in body text) so a plugin 
*could* use that.

It seemed to me that it was also a request to make it possible for 
URIBL* rules to adjust scores based on the provenance of the "URI" which 
I don't believe is possible without a substantial amount of new code & 
documentation.

I've closed it with a bit of discussion. I don't think the high-level 
problem has been entirely resolved (filenames being checked as URI 
domains causing FPs) but I'm not sure that is a big enough problem to 
demand a fix.

-- 
Bill Cole
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) or [email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])
(AKA @[email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) and many 
*@billmail.scconsult.com 
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire

Reply via email to