Should be binary-compatible across 2.10.x, so yes.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>wrote: > Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you > can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right? > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > We don't actually use Scala from the user's OS anymore, we use it from > the > > Spark build, so it's not a big deal. This release just has some bug > fixes. > > > > Matei > > > > On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Kay Ousterhout <k...@eecs.berkeley.edu> > > wrote: > > > > > What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth > the > > > annoyance of everyone needing to download a new version of Scala, > making > > > yet another version of the AMIs, etc. > > > > > > -Kay > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Matei Zaharia < > matei.zaha...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it's a small change > (it > > >> leads to better Git history and such). > > >> > > >> Matei > > >> > > >> On Mar 27, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Mark Hamstra <m...@clearstorydata.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> FYI, Spark master does build cleanly and the tests do run > successfully > > >> with > > >>> Scala version set to 2.10.4, so we can probably bump 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT > to > > >> use > > >>> the new version anytime we care to. > > >> > > >> > > > > >
